New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard

June 16th, 2006 | By: Trent | 1 Comment »

Last time I was in New York, USA–for Ecuador’s friendly against Colombia–the ‘New York Times’ opined that Ecuador had qualified for the World Cup solely because of its high-altitude home field advantage. Today, the New York Times rethinks its earlier position. Expect more of this.



Related Posts


Subscribe
 

rss icon Ecuador World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard digg:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard newsvine:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard reddit:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard fark:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard Y!:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard stumbleupon:New York Times Rethinks Altitude Canard

Comments
Username By Randy Tinfow | June 16th, 2006 at 4:36 am
top comment
cornercorner

Saw Ecuador vs. Italy in the New York see level heat last year. Ecuador looked like the superior team and their right back looked as dangerous with the ball as anyone save Roberto Carlos.

They are no suprise to me…

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Ecuador Club Football News

More South America Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog